Cardwell v. County of Fresno et al

Filing 32

ORDER ON STIPULATIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE (Doc. 31) signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on April 19, 2012. (Munoz, I)

1
2
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

SCOTT CARDWELL,

7
8
9

CASE NO. 1:10-CV-1249-LJO-SMS

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON STIPULATIONS TO
MOTIONS IN LIMINE (Doc. 31)

vs.
COUNTY OF FRESNO and DAVID
GODFREY,

10
Defendants.
11
12
13
14

/
The Court has received and reviewed the Stipulations re Motions in Limine (Doc. 31). All are
granted. The ORDER Of the Court is as follows:
1.

Counsel are precluded from making reference to:

15

A.

The size of McCormick Barstow;

16

B.

Tape recordings made by the plaintiff of his conversations with employees of the

17

defendant;

18

C.

Kevin Locke's shopping for a car during working hours; and

19

D.

Bert Weldon's having a trailer at the county yard.

20

2.

Witnesses shall be excluded from the courtroom except when they are testifying; and

21

3.

The first cause of action for ADA discrimination does not apply to David Godfry.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Dated:
b9ed48

April 19, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
1