Williams v. Anderson
Filing
38
ORDER Assigning Action to Magistrate Judge Boone; New Case Number is: 1:10-cv-1250 SAB (PC), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/27/13. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
CASE No. 1:10-cv-01250-LJO-SAB (PC)
SYLESTER WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff
10
v.
11
12
ORDER ASSIGNING ACTION TO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
(ECF Nos. 36 & 37)
SERGEANT R. ANDERSON,
Defendant.
13
14
Plaintiff Sylester Williams, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
15
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 13, 2010. This action is proceeding
16
against Defendant Sergeant Anderson for subjecting Plaintiff to conditions and confinement in
17
violation of the Eighth Amendment. Plaintiff consented to United States Magistrate Judge
18
jurisdiction on September 26, 2013. (ECF No. 37.) Defendant consented to United States
19
Magistrate Judge jurisdiction on September 25, 2013. (ECF No. 36.)
20
In light of the fact that Plaintiff and Defendant have voluntarily consented to have a United
21
States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including the trial and
22
entry of a final judgment, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1.
This action is assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone for all
24
purposes within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to conduct any and all further proceedings in
25
the case, including the trial and entry of final judgment;
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
2
3
2.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to reassign this action in its entirety to United
States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone; and
3.
The new case number shall be 1:10-cv-01250-SAB (PC).
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
September 27, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
DEAC_Signature-END:
b9ed48bb
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?