Williams v. Anderson

Filing 89

ORDER DIRECTING Defendant to File Opposition OR Statement of No Opposition to Plaintiff's 83 Motion to Compel and 84 Motion for Subpoena Within Fifteen Days From the Date of Service of This Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/2/2014. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 SYLESTER WILLIAMS, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 v. SERGEANT R. ANDERSON, et al., 11 Defendant. 12 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-01250-SAB (PC) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NO OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND MOTION FOR SUBPOENA WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER [ECF Nos. 83, 84] 13 Plaintiff Sylester Williams is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 14 15 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 30, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel and a motion to allow Plaintiff to 16 17 subpoena certain log books and time cards. (ECF Nos. 83, 84.) Defendant did not file an opposition 18 or statement of no opposition pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). Defendant is forewarned that Local Rule 19 230(l) requires an opposition or statement of no opposition, and the failure to do so may be deemed a 20 waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and/or imposition of sanctions. Local Rule 21 230(l). Accordingly, within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, Defendant shall 22 file an opposition or statement of no opposition to Plaintiff’s motions. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: 26 December 2, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?