Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Time signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/6/2011. (Bradley, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX KATHRYN R. WATSON Special Assistant United States Attorney California Bar No. 244142 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8928 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: kathryn.watson@ssa.gov 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRESNO DIVISION 11 PIO RODRIGUEZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. _________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:10-CV-01255-GSA STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 17 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their attorneys, and with the 19 permission of the Court as evidenced below, that Defendant’s time for responding to Plaintiff’s Motion 20 for Summary Judgment is hereby extended 30 days through July 3, 2011. This is Defendant’s first 21 request for an extension in this case. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 1 Defendant needs the additional time to further review the file and prepare a response in this matter. 2 3 Respectfully submitted, 4 5 Dated: June 3, 2011 /s/ Marc Kalagian (authorized by email) MARC KALAGIAN Attorney for Plaintiff Dated June 6, 2011 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 6 7 8 9 10 11 /s/ Kathryn R. Watson KATHRYN R. WATSON Special Assistant United States Attorney 12 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER The Court adopts the stipulation filed June 6, 2011. Defendant’s opposition SHALL now be filed on or before July 6, 2011. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 18 i70h38 June 6, 2011 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?