Adler v. Sullivan et al
Filing
56
ORDER Dismissing Action, with Prejudice, pursuant to Parties' Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/9/14. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
Case No. 1:10-cv-01269-AWI-SKO (PC)
BRENT ADLER,
6
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO PARTIES’
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL
Plaintiff,
7
v.
8
9
WARDEN W. J. SULLIVAN, et al.,
Defendants.
10
11
12
(Doc. 55)
_____________________________________/
Plaintiff Brent Adler, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
13 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 15, 2010. This action for damages is
14 proceeding on Plaintiff’s amended complaint, filed on August 1, 2011, against Defendants
15 Sullivan, Gonzalez, Carrasco, Bryant, Large, Steadman, and Noyce for denial of adequate outdoor
16 exercise, in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
17
On June 13, 2014, the parties participated in a settlement conference before United States
18 Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone and reached a settlement agreement. On September 8, 2014,
19 the parties filed a signed stipulation of voluntary dismissal of this action, with prejudice. Fed. R.
20 Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
21
According, this action is HEREBY ORDERED dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to the
22 parties’ stipulation of dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).
23
24 IT IS SO ORDERED.
25 Dated: September 9, 2014
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?