Delgado v. The Munis Company II et al

Filing 26

STIPULATION For Dismissal of Actiona and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/7/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Delgado 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 DANIEL DELGADO, ) No. 1:10-cv-01303-SKO ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ) ACTION; ORDER ) vs. ) THE MUNIRS COMPANY II, dba IHOP ) ) #654 aka INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES, BRE/LQ PROPERTIES, L.L.C., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Daniel Delgado, Defendant 19 The Munirs Company II and Defendant BRE/LQ Properties, L.L.C., the parties to this action, 20 by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 22 Dated: June 7, 2011 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 23 24 /s/Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Delgado 25 26 27 /// 28 /// Delgado v. The Munirs Company II, et al. Stipulation for Dismissal; Order Page 1 1 Dated: June 7, 2011 FLEMING, P.C. 2 3 /s/ George E. Fleming George E. Fleming, Attorneys for Defendant BRE/LQ Properties, L.L.C. 4 5 6 Dated: June 7, 2011 Weintraub genshlea chediak law corporation 7 8 /s/ Alden J. Parker Alden J. Parker, Attorneys for Defendant The Munirs Company II, dba IHOP #654 9 10 11 ORDER 12 13 The parties having so stipulated, 14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: 19 20 21 June 7, 2011 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: ie14hje 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Delgado v. The Munirs Company II, et al. Stipulation for Dismissal; Order Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?