Delgado v. The Munis Company II et al
Filing
26
STIPULATION For Dismissal of Actiona and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/7/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Daniel Delgado
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
DANIEL DELGADO,
) No. 1:10-cv-01303-SKO
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
vs.
)
THE MUNIRS COMPANY II, dba IHOP
)
)
#654 aka INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF
PANCAKES, BRE/LQ PROPERTIES, L.L.C., )
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Daniel Delgado, Defendant
19
The Munirs Company II and Defendant BRE/LQ Properties, L.L.C., the parties to this action,
20
by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
21
41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
22
Dated: June 7, 2011
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
23
24
/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Delgado
25
26
27
///
28
///
Delgado v. The Munirs Company II, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order
Page 1
1
Dated: June 7, 2011
FLEMING, P.C.
2
3
/s/ George E. Fleming
George E. Fleming, Attorneys for Defendant
BRE/LQ Properties, L.L.C.
4
5
6
Dated: June 7, 2011
Weintraub genshlea chediak
law corporation
7
8
/s/ Alden J. Parker
Alden J. Parker, Attorneys for Defendant
The Munirs Company II, dba IHOP #654
9
10
11
ORDER
12
13
The parties having so stipulated,
14
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
Dated:
19
20
21
June 7, 2011
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
ie14hje
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Delgado v. The Munirs Company II, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?