Gutierrez v. Singh et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION and ORDER for DISMISSAL of Action signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/26/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Natividad Gutierrez

6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

NATIVIDAD GUTIERREZ,

) No. 1:10-CV-01328-SKO
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
vs.
)
HARDEEP SINGH dba FRESNO CENTRAL )
MARKET aka FRESNO SUPER MARKET; )
)
PARMJIT K. GREWAL,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)

19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Natividad Gutierrez and

20

Defendants Hardeep Singh dba Fresno Central Market aka Fresno Super Market, and Parmjit K.

21

Grewal, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to

22

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with

23

prejudice in its entirety.

24

Date: September 26, 2011

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

25
26
/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff

27
28

///
Gutierrez vs. Hardeep Singh, et al.

Stipulation for Dismissal

Page 1

1

Date: September 26, 2011

THORNTON DAVIDSON &
ASSOCIATES

2
3
4

/s/ Thornton Davidson
Thornton Davidson, Attorneys
for Defendants Hardeep Singh, dba
Fresno Central Market aka Fresno
Super Market, and Parmjit Grewal

5
6
7

ORDER

8
9
The parties having so stipulated,

10

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

11
12
13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

16
17
18

September 26, 2011

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

ie14hje

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Gutierrez vs. Hardeep Singh, et al.

Stipulation for Dismissal

Page 2