Simmons v. Rite of Passage Athletic Training Centers and Schools et al

Filing 45

ORDER Regarding 43 Motion to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/7/2012. (Bradley, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN EUGENE SIMMONS, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ) 1: 10-cv-1331 LJO-GSA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER REGARDING MOTION ) TO COMPEL ) RITE OF PASSAGE ATHLETIC ) TRAINING CENTERS AND SCHOOLS; ) DAVID HARPER; STEVEN ISBELL; and ) ANGELA ECKHARDT, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 18 19 A Motion to Compel has been filed in this case. The parties are advised that the personal 20 appearance of counsel is required at the Motion to Compel scheduled for April 13, 2012 at 9:30 21 am. (Docs. 43, 44). The parties are encouraged to work together during meet and confer sessions 22 prior to the hearing. However, if a resolution is not reached prior to the hearing, the parties shall 23 be required to participate in a meet and confer session with each other and with Judge Austin on 24 the day of the hearing which will last through the morning and possibly extend into the afternoon 25 until an agreement is reached, or until the Court determines the dispute is ripe for decision. 26 The parties are advised that they must file a joint statement pursuant to Local Rule 251(c) 27 no later than seven days prior to the hearing. The joint statement shall not be longer than twenty28 1 1 five pages excluding exhibits. The parties must establish good cause and obtain prior Court 2 approval to exceed this page limit. Failure to timely file the joint statement will result in the 3 removal of this motion from the Court’s calendar. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij March 7, 2012 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?