Simmons v. Rite of Passage Athletic Training Centers and Schools et al

Filing 48

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE WHY SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAPERS SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN (doc. 29) signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on March 14, 2012. (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KEVIN SIMMONS, 10 11 12 CASE NO. CV F 10-1331 LJO GSA Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAPERS SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN (Doc. 29.) vs. 13 RITE OF PASSAGE ATHLETIC TRAINING CENTERS AND SCHOOLS, et al., 14 Defendants. / 15 16 This Court’s December 15, 2011 order, based on the parties’ stipulation, required defendants, 17 no later than March 8, 2012, to file and serve dispositive motion papers. This Court’s Local Rule 230(b) 18 requires a moving party to file “a notice of motion, motion, accompanying briefs, affidavits, if 19 appropriate, and copies of all documentary evidence that the moving party intends to submit in support 20 of the motion.” On March 8, 2012, defendants filed a notice of summary judgment motion with no 21 supporting papers. On March 13, 2012, after Court staff informed defense counsel of disobedience of 22 the December 15, 2011 order and Local Rule 230(b), defendants filed an amended notice of motion and 23 supporting papers for summary judgment. Defendants’ papers fail to address disobedience of the 24 December 15, 2011 order and Local Rule 230(b). 25 This Court’s Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with an order of this Court “may be 26 grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the 27 inherent power of the Court.” 28 This Court ORDERS the defendants, no later than March 19, 2012, to file and serve papers to 1 1 show cause why this Court should not strike defendants’ summary judgment papers and vacate the April 2 10, 2012 summary judgment hearing due to defendants’ disobedience of the December 15, 2011 order 3 and Local Rule 230(b). 4 This Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they are required to obey the Federal 5 Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this 6 Court deems appropriate. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: 66h44d March 14, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?