Simmons v. Rite of Passage Athletic Training Centers and Schools et al
Filing
61
ORDER TO SET FURTHER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND TO RESET PRETRIAL CONFERENCE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on May 15, 2012. Settlement Conference set for 6/12/2012 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. Pretrial Conference currently set for 5/22/2012 has been CONTINUED to 6/26/2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Munoz, I)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
KEVIN SIMMONS,
10
11
12
CASE NO. CV F 10-1331 LJO GSA
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SET FURTHER SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE AND TO RESET PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE
vs.
13
RITE OF PASSAGE ATHLETIC
TRAINING CENTERS AND
SCHOOLS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
/
15
16
To accommodate the parties, this Court:
17
1.
18
19
SETS a further settlement conference for June 12, 2012 at 10:30 a.m. before U.S.
Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck in Courtroom 9;
2.
ORDERS the parties, no later than June 8, 2012, to submit updated confidential
20
settlement conference statements to address the current settlement posture and the
21
parties’ respective settlement positions;
22
3.
VACATES the May 22, 2012 pretrial conference and RESETS the pretrial conference
23
for June 26, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. before U.S. District Judge Lawrence O’Neill in Courtroom
24
4;
25
4.
26
27
28
ORDERS the parties, no later than June 19, 2012, to file a joint pretrial statement which
complies with Local Rule 281;
5.
RECONFIRMS the July 31, 2012 trial which will not be reset absent absolute good
cause; and
1
1
6.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated:
66h44d
DIRECTS the clerk to serve this order on U.S. Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck.
May 15, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?