Tubach v. Vasudeva et al

Filing 4

ORDER DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP and REQUIRING Plaintiff to Pay the $350.00 Filing Fee In Full Within 30 Days or Dismissal Will Occur Without Prejudice, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/2/2010. (Filing Fee Deadline: 9/7/2010.) (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
(PC) Tubach v. Vasudeva et al Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ISABEL TUBACH, Plaintiff, v. A. VASUDEVA, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-1340-AWI-MJS (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY $350.00 FILING FEE IN FULL WITHIN THIRTY DAYS, OR DISMISSAL WILL OCCUR (Doc. 2) / Plaintiff Isabel Tubach ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 26, 2010. Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915 governs proceedings in forma pauperis. Section 1915(g) provides that "[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury." A review of the actions filed by Plaintiff reveals that Plaintiff is subject to § 1915(g) and is precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis unless Plaintiff is, at the time the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 complaint is filed, under imminent danger of serious physical injury.1 The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's complaint and finds that Plaintiff does not meet the imminent danger exception.2 Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1053 (9th Cir. 2007). Because Plaintiff has alleged no facts that support a finding that she is under imminent danger of serious physical injury, Plaintiff is ineligible to proceed in forma pauperis in this action, and must submit the appropriate filing fee in order to proceed with this action. Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this action is denied; and Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in full within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order or this action will be dismissed, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 August 2, 2010 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Court takes judicial notice of the following cases filed by Plaintiff: Tubach v. Davis, et al., 1:03-cv5 1 8 2 -O W W -S M S (E.D. Cal., dismissed as frivolous on June 12, 2003); Tubach v. Eby, et al., 1:02-cv-6023-RECT A G (E.D. Cal., dismissed as frivolous on March 31, 2004); Tubach v. Davis, et al., 1:03-cv-5012-OW W -S M S ( E .D . Cal., dismissed as frivolous on June 20, 2003). Plaintiff's allegations concern the adequacy of her medical care but do not allege that she is in imminent d a n g e r of serious physical injury. See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1053 (9th Cir. 2007). 2 1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?