Losorwith v. Borunda Incorporated et al

Filing 16

ORDER DISMISSING CASE due to 15 Stipulation, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/22/2010. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
Losorwith v. Borunda Incorporated et al Doc. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Tanya Moore, Esq. SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 N. Second Street San Jose, CA 95112 Telephone (408) 271-6600 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Attorneys for Plaintiff Kelli Losorwith UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) No. 1:10-CV-01364-LJO-SMS ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF Plaintiff, ) ACTION; ORDER ) vs. ) BORUNDA INCORPORATED dba PLAZA ) ) VENTANA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) KELLI LOSORWITH, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties who have appeared in this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Date: December 22, 2010 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. /s/Tanya Moore Tanya Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff Losorwith v. Borunda, et al. Stipulation for Dismissal Page 1 Dockets.Justia 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date: December 22, 2010 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP /s/ Marc B. Koenigsberg Marc B. Koenigsberg, Attorneys for Defendant Borunda Inc. dba Plaza Ventana Date: December 21, 2010 DOWLING, AARON & KEELER, INC. /s/ Keith M. White Keith M. White, Attorneys for Defendant Times Square Holding, Inc. ORDER The parties having so stipulated, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this action in its entirety. Dated: December 22, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Court Judge Losorwith v. Borunda, et al. Stipulation for Dismissal Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?