Rodriguez et al v. City of Modesto et al

Filing 73

ORDER RE REQUEST TO CONTINUE FOR THE OPPOSITION DUE DATE RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on February 19, 2015. (Munoz, I)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ and CHARISSE
4 FERNANDEZ,
Plaintiffs,

5
6 v.

Case No: 10-cv-01370 LJO MJS
ORDER RE REQUEST TO CONTINUE
FOR THE OPPOSITION DUE DATE RE
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.

7 CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation;
RON CLOWARD, Lieutenant; JOHN
8 BUEHLER, Sergeant; JAMES MURPHY,
RONNY ZIYA, MARK FONTES and
9 KALANI SOUZA, Police Officers, in their
individual and official capacities; and Does 1
10 through 10,
Defendants.

11
12

Having considered Defendants’ request for an extension of time to file an opposition to

13 Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, Doc. 71, and Plaintiffs’ opposition thereto, Doc. 72, the
14 Court finds there is good cause for a brief extension, not the two-week extension requested by
15 Defendants. Accordingly, the Court hereby continues the deadline for the filing of Defendants’
16 opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment to February 26, 2015. In the interest of
17 fairness, Plaintiffs’ reply deadline is continued to March 10, 2015. In addition, the hearing on the
18 motion for summary judgment is VACATED and the matter will be taken under submission on the
19 papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) upon the expiration of the reply deadline. The Court will
20 endeavor to issue a ruling as soon as possible after any reply is filed and does not anticipate any
21 prejudicial delay.
22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 19, 2015

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28

1
Order Re Request to Continue for Two Weeks the Opposition Due Date re Motion for Summary Judgment [10-cv01370 LJO MJS]