Stevenson v. Kellums et al

Filing 33

ORDER Denying Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (Document # 24 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/27/2012. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 STEVIE STEVENSON, 9 1:10-cv-01401-AWI-DLB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 10 v. 11 B. KELLUMS, et al., ( DOCUMENT # 24) 12 Defendants. 13 ________________________________/ 14 On February 3, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion seeking the appointment of counsel pursuant 15 to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in 16 this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the Court cannot require 17 an attorney to represent Plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. United States 18 District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). However, in certain 19 exceptional circumstances the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525. 21 Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis in this action. The filing fee was paid in full 22 when this action was brought before the Court. Thus, § 1915(e)(1) is inapplicable. Accordingly, 23 it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel pursuant to 28 24 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) is denied. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 77e0d6 March 27, 2012 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?