Stevenson v. Kellums et al
Filing
33
ORDER Denying Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (Document # 24 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/27/2012. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
STEVIE STEVENSON,
9
1:10-cv-01401-AWI-DLB (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
10
v.
11
B. KELLUMS, et al.,
( DOCUMENT # 24)
12
Defendants.
13
________________________________/
14
On February 3, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion seeking the appointment of counsel pursuant
15
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in
16
this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the Court cannot require
17
an attorney to represent Plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. United States
18
District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). However, in certain
19
exceptional circumstances the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to
20
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525.
21
Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis in this action. The filing fee was paid in full
22
when this action was brought before the Court. Thus, § 1915(e)(1) is inapplicable. Accordingly,
23
it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel pursuant to 28
24
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) is denied.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
77e0d6
March 27, 2012
/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?