Quezada v. Lindsey et al

Filing 76

ORDER OVERRULING Plaintiff's Objections to Defendants' Request to Extend the Time to File a Dispositive Motion signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/17/2015. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ALVARO QUEZADA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
R. LINDSEY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01402-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S
OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST
TO EXTEND THE TIME TO FILE A
DISPOSITIVE MOTION
[ECF Nos. 73, 75]

Plaintiff Alvaro Quezada is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

On March 5, 2015, Defendants requested and this Court granted an extension of time to file a

20

dispositive motion. (ECF Nos. 72, 73.) In the request, defense counsel declared that Defendant Patel

21

recently suffered a stroke and is unavailable to review or sign a declaration to support a motion for

22

summary judgment. (ECF No. 72.)
On March 16, 2015, Plaintiff filed objections to the Defendants’ request for an extension of

23
24

time to file a dispositive motion. (ECF No. 71.)

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

Plaintiff’s objections do not overcome the showing of good cause presented by Defendants in

1
2

their motion to extend the time to file a dispositive motion, and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

3

Plaintiff’s objections to Defendants’ request to extend the time are OVERRULED.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated:

7

March 17, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2