McMaster v. Spearman et al

Filing 131

ORDER Granting Defendants' 130 Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct Plaintiff's Deposition Nunc Pro Tunc, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/12/16. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

DANA MCMASTER,

10

Plaintiff,

11

v.

12

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
CONDUCT PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION
NUNC PRO TUNC

M. E. SPEARMAN, et al.,

13

Case No. 1:10-cv-01407-AWI-SKO (PC)

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

(Doc. 130)
14
Plaintiff, Dana McMaster, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,

15

16 filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 6, 2010. On August 18, 2016,
17 Defendants filed a motion requesting an extension of time up to and including August 30, 2016 to
18 take Plaintiff’s deposition and for any corresponding motion to compel, if needed. (Doc. 130.)
Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING

19

20 THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are granted an extension of time up to
21 and including August 30, 2016 to conduct Plaintiff’s deposition nunc pro tunc.
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 Dated:
25
26
27
28

September 12, 2016

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

.