McMaster v. Spearman et al

Filing 81

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Within Forty-Five Days 65 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/16/14. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

DANA MCMASTER,
Plaintiff,

11
v.

12
13

M. E. SPEARMAN, et al.,

14

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:10-cv-01407-AWI-SKO (PC)
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN
FORTY-FIVE DAYS
(Doc. 65)

15
16

Plaintiff Dana McMaster, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed

17 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 6, 2010. This action is proceeding
18 on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed January 3, 2013, against Defendants Carlson,
19 Garcia, Sedwick, Espitia, and John Doe 1 for failing to protect him, in violation of the Eighth
20 Amendment, and against Defendant Carlson for retaliation, in violation of the First Amendment.
21

On November 14, 2013, Defendant Carlson, Garcia, Sedwick, and Espitia filed a motion

22 for summary judgment. The parties’ outstanding discovery disputes have been resolved and
23 discovery is now closed. (Doc. 78.)
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///

1

Accordingly, within forty-five (45) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff is

2 ORDERED to file his opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion for
3 summary judgment.
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 16, 2014

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2