Beames v. Cullen

Filing 116

SCHEDULING ORDER Following Status Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/8/2015. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN MICHAEL BEAMES,

12
13
14
15

Case No. 1:10-cv-01429-AWI-SAB
DEATH PENALTY CASE

Petitioner,
v.

SCHEDULING ORDER FOLLOWING
STATUS CONFERENCE

KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden of San Quentin
State Prison,

Evidentiary Hearing:

17

Date: February 1, 2016
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 9
Judge: Stanley A. Boone

18

(Estimated 4-5 Day Hearing)

16

Respondent.

19
20
21

Petitioner’s federal petition was filed on July 27, 2011. On August 2, 2011, the Court

22 found that claim 11 stated a colorable claim. On May 17, 2012, the Court found that claims 4, 5,
23 (plus 11), 29, 30, 37, 41 and 43M were exhausted and that claims 1, 2, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15,
24 16, 17, 18, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 35D, 42 and 49 were not exhausted. On March 4, 2014, the Court
25 set an evidentiary hearing on claim 11 for May 19, 2015. On March 28, 2014, District Judge
26 Anthony W. Ishii assigned this action to the undersigned. On December 11, 2014, the Court
27 vacated the evidentiary hearing, with rescheduling to follow the Court’s ruling on Respondent’s
28 then pending motion to dismiss.
1

1

On January 28, 2015, the Court ordered the federal petition amended by withdrawal of

2 the above referenced unexhausted claims.

On that date, the Court also denied as moot

3 Respondent’s motion to dismiss. The parties filed a joint status conference statement on March
4 26, 2015. In it, counsel informed the Court of the recent discovery of autopsy-related materials,
5 and proposed pre-evidentiary hearing deadlines for review and analysis of these recently
6 discovered materials and other pre-hearing events. A telephonic status conference was held on
7 April 1, 2015. Counsel Harry Simon and Matthew Scoble appeared for Petitioner and counsel
8 Robert Gezi appeared for Respondent.
9

The Court is aware that previously cases in the Eastern District have proceeded to

10 evidentiary hearing on limited claims and briefing on the remaining claims occurred after an
11 order issued addressing claims covered during the evidentiary hearing. The Court finds that this
12 has resulted in undue delay in addressing the claims of the petitioner. Accordingly, upon review
13 of the status and history of this action, the Court determines that the parties shall be required to
14 brief the remaining claims in the petition for consideration at the close of the evidentiary hearing
15 (two track approach). If the parties object to briefing the remaining claims while they are
16 preparing for the evidentiary hearing, because of the matters raised at the telephonic status
17 conference or otherwise, the Court will consider amending the present evidentiary hearing
18 schedule until the parties have filed their briefs on the claims remaining in the petition. The
19 parties are reminded of the heavy caseload on this Court’s docket. The Court must therefore
20 address issues regarding management of its cases to avoid the harsh impact of failing to timely
21 resolve the cases brought by litigants.
22

The parties May 4, 2015 joint statement (below) shall address any objections to the Court

23 proceeding on this two track approach to resolving this action. Any objections raised must be
24 explained in detail in the joint statement or they will be considered waived. Based upon the
25 parties’ submission, the Court may revise the schedule set forth below and/or set a briefing
26 schedule on the remaining claims that would necessitate continuing the evidentiary hearing.
27

The Court now provides further scheduling and direction.

28

It is HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
2

1

A.

Regarding Record Claims.
1.

2

Not later than May 4, 2015:
a.

3

For claims 4, 5, 29, 30, 37, 41 and 43M, the parties shall meet and

4

confer and file a joint statement setting forth in detail a proposed

5

schedule for submission of an answer and traverse; points and

6

authorities addressing 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) in support of and

7

opposition to these claims; Petitioner’s reply; and any motion(s)

8

for factual development. The joint statement shall also address any

9

procedural issues that need to be discussed before these claims

10

move to phase III and, if so, a timeline for litigating them. The

11

Court will not entertain a request for summary judgment. Once the

12

joint statement is filed, the Court will set a phase III case

13

management conference to discuss merits briefing and any

14

budgetary issues ex parte with Petitioner, and may modify this

15

order.

16

procedural defenses.
b.

17

The merits of the claims will be addressed prior to

For claims 3, 7, 19, 20, 21, 22, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35A-C, 36, 38,

18

39, 40, 43A-L and N, 44, 45, 46, and 47, the parties shall meet and

19

confer and file a further joint statement regarding exhaustion

20

status, including the basis for their respective positions where they

21

disagree.
c.

22

advise of any intention to withdraw or dismiss.

23
24
25

B.

Regarding Claim 11.
1.

28

The evidentiary hearing is set for February 1, 2016, at 9:00 a.m., in
Department 9, before the undersigned.

26
27

For all claims reference in “a” and “b” above, Petitioner shall

2.

Not later than August 21, 2015:
a.

The parties shall disclose expert witness testimony and related
3

1

reports pursuant to Rule 26(a)(2). Any motion to conduct a pre-

2

hearing discovery deposition of an opposing party’s expert shall be

3

filed within 10 days of the disclosure. Any motion to exclude an

4

opposing party’s proffered expert witness shall also be filed within

5

10 days of the disclosure. Opposition to either motion shall be

6

filed 10 days thereafter, and if the Court deems a hearing necessary

7

the matter shall be set for telephonic hearing 7 days thereafter or

8

on the next available date on the Court’s calendar.
b.

9

hearing in person or participate via video conference.

10
11

The parties may request that Petitioner attend the evidentiary

3.

Not later than September 21, 2015:
a.

12

The parties shall disclose lay witness lists. Any motion to conduct

13

a pre-hearing discovery deposition of an opposing party’s lay

14

witness shall be filed within 10 days of the disclosure. Any motion

15

to exclude an opposing party’s lay witness shall also be filed

16

within 10 days of the disclosure. Opposition to either motion shall

17

be filed 10 days thereafter, and if the Court deems a hearing

18

necessary the matter shall be set for telephonic hearing 7 days

19

thereafter or on the next available date on the Court’s calendar.
b.

20

The parties may move the Court pursuant to Rule 6 of the § 2254

21

Rules for the production of documents under Federal Rule of Civil

22

Procedure 26(b)(3)(A). Opposition to such motions shall be filed

23

10 days thereafter, and if the Court deems a hearing necessary the

24

matter(s) shall be set for telephonic hearing 7 days thereafter or on

25

the next available date on the Court’s calendar. Within 5 days of

26

the Court’s ruling on any motion for discovery, any additional

27

discovery ordered by the Court shall be produced.

28

4.

Not later than November 2, 2015:
4

a.

1

The parties shall disclose rebuttal expert witness testimony and

2

related reports. Any motion to conduct a pre-hearing discovery

3

deposition of an opposing party’s rebuttal expert shall be made

4

within 10 days of the disclosure.

5

opposing party’s proffered rebuttal expert shall also be filed within

6

10 days of the disclosure. Opposition to either motion shall be

7

filed 10 days thereafter, and if the Court deems a hearing necessary

8

the matter shall be set for telephonic hearing 7 days thereafter or

9

on the next available date on the Court’s calendar.
b.

10

Any motion to exclude an

Either party may file any discovery motion(s) not otherwise

11

provided for in this schedule. Opposition to such motions shall be

12

filed 10 days thereafter, and if the Court deems a hearing necessary

13

the matter(s) shall be set for telephonic hearing 7 days thereafter or

14

on the next available date on the Court’s calendar. Within 5 days

15

of the Court’s ruling on any motion for discovery, any additional

16

discovery ordered by the Court shall be produced.

17

5.

Not later than December 2, 2015:
a.

18

The parties shall file with the Court and serve upon each other final

19

witness and exhibit lists pursuant to Rule 26(a)(3). The parties

20

shall also file copies of any listed exhibits not previously filed in

21

this matter.

22
23

6

Not later than January 2, 2016:
a.

The parties shall file any in limine motions regarding the

24

admissibility of evidence, scope of witness testimony, etc. These

25

motions may be taken up at the outset of the evidentiary hearing.

26

b.

The parties shall meet and confer to determine (i) whether the

27

testimony of certain witnesses, if any, can be introduced via

28

written declaration with either a waiver of cross-examination, or
5

1

consent to conduct cross-examination by written interrogatories or

2

by production of the witness by the proffering party for cross-

3

examination in court, and (ii) whether they can stipulate to any

4

undisputed facts or legal or evidentiary issues - and file a joint pre-

5

hearing statement, which shall (i) identify counsel who will appear

6

at the hearing, (ii) identify any stipulated and uncontested facts,

7

and (iii) identify the contested issues of fact and law.
c.

8

conclusions of law.

9
10

The parties shall separately file proposed findings of fact and

7.

The evidentiary hearing will address claim 11. The parties, in addressing

11

this claim, shall state why proffered evidence does or does not support the

12

claim.

13

8.

After the evidentiary hearing, the Court may address record-based claims.

14

9.

Evidence shall be presented via live testimony unless the parties stipulate

15

otherwise, or the Court so orders. If the other party waives the right to

16

cross-examination or consents to conduct cross-examination by written

17

interrogatories, see 28 U.S.C. § 2246, or in court, the Court will generally

18

permit the admission of testimony by written declaration. Further, under

19

certain circumstances the Court may allow testimony to be introduced

20

from a pre-hearing deposition.

21

10.

Counsel shall create five complete, legible and identical sets of exhibits in

22

binders as follows: (a) three sets of binders to be delivered to Courtroom

23

Deputy Mamie Hernandez no later than January 29, 2016 (one for use by

24

the Courtroom Clerk and one for use by the Court and one for purposes of

25

questioning witnesses to be placed at the witness stand); and (b) one set

26

for each counsel. All of Petitioner’s exhibits shall be marked sequentially

27

beginning with 1 (e.g., 1, 2, etc.). All of Respondent’s exhibits shall be

28

marked sequentially beginning with A (e.g., A, B, C...AA, BB, CC...AAA,
6

BBB, CCC, etc.).

1
2

C.

Substitution of Respondent

3

Ron Davis, Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison, is substituted for his predecessor

4 wardens and acting wardens pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). The Court Clerk
5 is directed to make the appropriate correction to the docket.
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 Dated:

April 8, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7