Beames v. Cullen

Filing 5

ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL and Notice of Initial Case Management Conference signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/9/2010. Initial Case Management Conference set telephonically for 10/12/2010 at 02:30 PM. Attorney Timothy Joseph Brosnan for John Michael Beames added. (Bradley, A)

Download PDF
(DP) Beames v. Cullen Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 R e s p o n d e n t. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. V IN C E N T CULLEN, Acting Warden o f San Quentin State Prison, JO H N MICHAEL BEAMES, P e t i t io n e r , ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C a s e No. 1:10-CV-01429-AWI-P D E A T H PENALTY CASE O r d e r Appointing Counsel and N o tic e of Initial Case Management C o n fe re n c e D A TE: T IM E : O c to b e r 12, 2010 2 :3 0 p.m. U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA O n August 9, 2010, Petitioner John Michael Beames ("Beames"), a state p r is o n e r facing capital punishment, filed pro se applications for appointment of c o u n s e l, for stay of execution, and to proceed in forma pauperis, in the Eastern D is tr ic t of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. In forma pauperis status was g r a n te d , the execution was temporarily stayed, and the case was referred to the S e le c tio n Board of the Eastern District of California for recommendation of c o u n s e l on August 12, 2010. T h e Selection Board recommends the Capital Habeas Unit of the Federal D e fe n d e r 's Office of the Eastern District of California, 801 I Street, 3rd Floor, S a c r a m e n to , California, 95814, (916) 498-6666, and Timothy Brosnan, Esq., 1116 G u e r r e r o Street, San Francisco, California, 94110, (415) 285-5417, for appointment a s co-counsel to represent Beames. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 T h e Guide to Case Management and Budgeting in Capital Habeas Cases, E a s te r n District of California, Fresno Division1 (hereafter the "Attorney Guide") p r o v id e s an overview of the process for capital habeas corpus cases in this Court. Upon receipt of this order, counsel are directed to familiarize themselves with the A tto r n e y Guide. Mr. Brosnan was recently appointed to another capital habeas c a s e in this division, so the reimbursement rate established for him in that case w ill be applied to this case. C o u n s e l for both parties shall complete as much or all of the Confidential C a s e Evaluation Form (Appendix B to the Attorney Guide) as is possible at this s ta g e of the proceedings. The Confidential Case Evaluation Form shall be filed n o later than one week prior to the Case Management Conference ("CMC"), and m a y be submitted to the Court under seal. Appropriate budget forms will be e le c tr o n ic a lly transmitted to counsel concurrently with this order. See Attorney G u id e , 10. The proposed budget need only specify the hours and expenses for C JA counsel, but should indicate in the supporting declaration the division of la b o r and allocation of resources with the Federal Defender, including the hours a n tic ip a te d to be expended by the Federal Defender in each category. A p r e lim in a ry budget for Phase I of the litigation must be presented and approved b e fo r e any reimbursement for professional services will be authorized. See A tto r n e y Guide, 46-49. As specified in the Attorney Guide, the proposed b u d g e t and application, including supporting declarations and an electronic copy o f the Excel file, should be submitted to the Court under seal.2 The Attorney Guide is posted on the Court's website, under Attorney Info, F re sn o , Forms. 2 In this Court, documents which are approved for filing under seal are su b m itte d electronically to "" pursuant to Local R u le 141. Proposed budgets also should be sent by email to the staff attorney O A p p tC n s lB m s 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 A s indicated in the Attorney Guide, automated "Case Management Plan a n d Budget Forms" are created by the Ninth Circuit Judicial Council for use by c o u n s e l in capital habeas cases. The Forms have recently been updated to c o m b in e the former first two phases into one phase and to delineate between core a n d non-core record for purposes of document review. (See Ninth Circuit Costs P o lic y3 for distinction between, and limitations on, core and non-core records and r e v ie w .) The new phases are: P h ase I A p p o in tm e n t, Record Review, Petition Preparation, Answer, a n d Exhaustion P h a s e II M e r its Briefing, Fact Development Discovery, and Motion for E v id e n tia r y Hearing P h a s e III P r e -E v id e n tia r y Hearing Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing, and F in a l Briefing S in c e Beames' counsel are both new to the case, the initial Phase I budget w ill be limited to the tasks described in paragraphs 47 and 48 of the Attorney G u id e . The proposed budget should include all tasks to be completed during the in itia l Phase I budget, including any time spent on tasks which already have been c o m p le te d or partially performed. Counsel will not be reimbursed for work p e r fo r m e d before the date of appointment without prior approval on a showing o f good cause. T h e initial CMC is set for October 12, 2010, at 2:30 p.m., and will be held te le p h o n ic a lly . Beames' proposed budget for Phase I should be presented to the C o u r t without delay, but should be filed no later than one calendar week prior to a ssig n e d to the case. 3 The Ninth Circuit Judicial Council's Costs Policy is posted on the Court's w e b site , under Attorney Info, Fresno, Forms, CJA. O A p p tC n s lB m s 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 th e CMC. The purpose of the initial CMC will be to discuss the status of record a s s e m b ly and review by Beames' counsel, case complexity, an approximate date c o u n s e l for Respondent will be able to lodge the record, the one-year statute of lim ita tio n s , the scheduling of a second CMC, and any other matters the parties w is h to discuss together with the Court. Once case management issues are r e s o lv e d , counsel for Respondent will be excused from the CMC so the Court can d is c u s s budgeting procedures with Beames' counsel on an ex parte basis. G o o d cause appearing, T h e Federal Defender, Capital Habeas Unit, and Timothy Brosnan, Esq., a r e appointed as co-counsel to represent Beames for all purposes in these p r o c e e d in g s . T h e initial Case Management Conference will be held telephonically at 2:30 p .m ., on Tuesday, October 12, 2010. Counsel for Beames shall initiate the c o n fe r e n c e call. C o u n s e l for both parties shall file the Confidential Case Evaluation Form, a s indicated above. Counsel for Beames shall concurrently file the proposed b u d g e t for Phase I. IT IS SO ORDERED. D A TED : September 9, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii Chief United States District Judge O A p p tC n s lB m s 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?