Brown v. Beagley et al

Filing 81

STIPULATION and ORDER of DISMISSAL signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/5/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Michael G. Marderosian, No. 077296 Heather S. Cohen, No. 263093 MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE & LEHMAN 1260 Fulton Mall Fresno, CA 93721 Telephone: (559) 441-7991 Facsimile: (559) 441-8170 8 Virginia Gennaro, No. 138877 City Attorney CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Telephone: (661) 326-3721 Facsimile: (661) 852-2020 9 Attorneys for: Defendants JESS BEAGLEY and JUSTIN ENNS 6 7 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA / FRESNO DIVISION 12 BENNIE RAY BROWN, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) OFFICERS JESS BEAGLEY AND JUSTIN ) ENNS OF THE BAKERSFIELD POLICE ) DEPARTMENT ARE BEING SUED IN ) THEIR OWN INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY ) AND JOHN DOES 1-100, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 1:10-CV-1460 — JLT STIPULATED DISMISSAL; ORDER 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, through 21 their respective counsel, that all claims by plaintiff BENNIE RAY BROWN be dismissed as to all 22 defendants in this action with prejudice. 23 Dated: October 5, 2012 By: Dated: October 5, 2012 MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE & LEHMAN /s/ Bennie Ray Brown Bennie Ray Brown, Plaintiff In Pro Per 24 25 26 By: 27 28 MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE & LEHMAN 1260 Fulton Mall Fresno, CA 93721 /s/ Michael G. Marderosian Michael G. Marderosian, Attorney for Defendants above-named. 1 2 3 4 ORDER The stipulation of the parties having been read and considered by the Court, and good cause appearing therefor: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled action be dismissed with prejudice. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: October 5, 2012 9j7khi 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE & LEHMAN 1260 Fulton Mall Fresno, CA 93721 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?