Tafilele v. Harrington et al
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion To Begin Discovery And Motion For A Status Conference As Moot Per Scheduling Order (Doc. 29 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 11/7/2011. (Fahrney, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ASOFA V. TAFILELE,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
BEGIN DISCOVERY AND MOTION FOR A
STATUS CONFERENCE AS MOOT PER
KELLY HARRINGTON, et al.,
Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On October 19, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting a pretrial / status conference and permission
to start discovery. Doc. 29. On October 24, 2011, the Court issued a discovery and scheduling order.
Doc. 30. Moreover, pro se prisoner cases are not subject to conference requirements of Fed. R. Civ.
P. 26(f). Thus, Plaintiff’s request for discovery and a status conference is not necessary per the
discovery and scheduling order issued October 24, 2011.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
November 7, 2011
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?