Tafilele v. Harrington et al
Filing
41
ORDER Adopting 40 Findings and Recommendations and Denying 34 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/9/12. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
ASOFA V. TAFILELE,
CASE NO: 1:10-cv-01493-LJO-GBC (PC)
10
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
11
v.
12
KELLY HARRINGTON, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
/ Docs. 34, 40
15
16
On August 18, 2010, Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
17
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. Defendants were employed at Kern
18
Valley State Prison. See id. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On November 8, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Transfer Plaintiff to a facility with an
21
adequate law library against prison officials at Corcoran State Prison. Doc. 34. On May 18, 2012,
22
the Magistrate Judge construed this as a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and issued Findings and
23
Recommendations to deny the motion, as the allegations in Plaintiff’s complaint arose at Kern
24
Valley State Prison. Doc. 40. Plaintiff has not filed any objections.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de
26
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and
27
Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
28
//
Page 1 of 2
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 18, 2012, are ADOPTED, in full;
and
4
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, filed November 8, 2011, is DENIED.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
b9ed48
July 9, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?