Rubio v. Ben S. Park
Filing
10
ORDER on Request for Dismissal of Action, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/13/10: This action is DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
<![CDATA[
Rubio v. Ben S. Park
Doc. 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Tanya Moore, Esq. SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 N. Second Street San Jose, CA 95112 Telephone (408) 271-6600 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Attorneys for Plaintiff Fernando Rubio
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FERNANDO RUBIO, Plaintiff, vs. BEN S. PARK, et al., Defendant. ) No. 1:10-CV-01495-LJO-SMS ) ) REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ) ACTION; ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No Defendant having appeared in this action, Plaintiff hereby requests that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
Date: December 13, 2010
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
/s/Tanya Moore Tanya Moore Attorney for Plaintiff
Rubio v. Park Request for Dismissal
Page 1
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 13, 2010
ORDER No Defendant having appeared and upon the request of Plaintiff, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
_/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill_________ United States District Court Judge
Rubio v. Park Request for Dismissal
Page 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
