Porter v. Wegman et al
Filing
167
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's 157 Motion for Attendance of Incarcerated and Unincarcerated Witnesses; ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Provide Witness Information signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 07/11/2017. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRIAN ELLIS PORTER,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:10-cv-01500-BAM (PC)
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR ATTENDANCE OF
INCARCERATED AND
UNINCARCERATED WITNESSES
CHERYLEE WEGMAN,
(ECF No. 157)
Defendant.
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
PROVIDE WITNESS INFORMATION
17
18
Plaintiff Brian Ellis Porter (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
19
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 11, 2017, the Court held
20
a telephonic trial confirmation hearing. Plaintiff, appearing pro se, and Aseil Mohmoud and
21
Monica Anderson, counsel for Defendant, attended the hearing.
22
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s June 19, 2017 motion for the attendance of the
23
following unincarcerated witnesses: (1) Paul Shleffar (Jewish Chaplain of CDCR), (2) Denice
24
Porter, (3) Ellis Porter, and (4) Lisa Turner, and the following incarcerated witnesses: (1) Donald
25
Ray Perry (CDCR #P92110, Correctional Training Facility (“Soledad State Prison”)); (2) George
26
Hamilton (CDCR #K54885, Pelican Bay State Prison); (3) Allen B. Williams (CDCR #C09851,
27
Ironwood State Prison); and (4) Jimmy Serna (CDCR #AK2741, Kern Valley State Prison).
28
Defendants filed an opposition on June 30, 2017. (ECF No. 159.)
1
The Court will also address the two additional witnesses listed in Plaintiff’s pretrial
1
2
statement: Francisco Diaz, Catholic Chaplain at Kern Valley State Prison, and Maurice Howard,
3
Muslim Chaplain at Kern Valley State Prison. (ECF No. 162, p. 9.) The Court heard arguments
4
on this matter at the telephonic trial confirmation hearing on July 11, 2017.
5
I.
Motion for Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses
In determining whether to grant Plaintiff’s motions for the attendance of incarcerated
6
7
witnesses, the Court considers the following factors: (1) whether the inmate’s presence will
8
substantially further the resolution of the case, (2) the security risks presented by the inmate’s
9
presence, (3) the expense of transportation and security, and (4) whether the suit can be stayed
10
until the inmate is released without prejudice to the cause asserted. Wiggins v. Cty. of Alameda,
11
717 F.2d 466, 468 n.1 (9th Cir. 1983); see also Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1422 (9th Cir.
12
1994) (district court did not abuse its discretion when it concluded the inconvenience and expense
13
of transporting inmate witness outweighed any benefit he could provide where the importance of
14
the witness’s testimony could not be determined), abrogated on other grounds by Sandin v.
15
Conner, 515 U.S. 472 (1995).
For reasons stated on the record, Plaintiff’s motion for incarcerated witnesses is denied.
16
17
II.
18
Motion for Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses
As discussed on the record, Plaintiff has failed to include declarations showing that each
19
unincarcerated witness is willing to testify and that each witness has actual knowledge of relevant
20
facts.
21
A. Voluntary Unincarcerated Witnesses
22
Plaintiff stated during the trial confirmation hearing that Denice Porter, Ellis Porter, and
23
Lisa Turner have agreed to testify voluntarily, and do not require subpoenas. As stated on the
24
record, Plaintiff may also call Francisco Diaz and Maurice Howard to appear voluntarily, but the
25
Court will not compel these witnesses to appear by subpoena.
26
Plaintiff is advised that any unincarcerated witnesses who may voluntarily appear will not
27
be precluded at this time, but an offer of proof must be made before they will be permitted to
28
testify. Plaintiff’s offer of proof must show the willingness of the prospective witness to testify
2
1
and that each witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. (See ECF No. 152, pp. 2–3.)
2
B. Involuntary Unincarcerated Witness
3
For reasons stated on the record, Plaintiff will be permitted to call Rabbi Paul Shleffar to
4
testify. Pursuant to the Court’s April 17, 2017 Amended Scheduling Order, Plaintiff must notify
5
the Court in writing of the location of Rabbi Paul Shleffar. The Court will calculate the travel
6
expense for the witness and notify Plaintiff of the amount. Plaintiff must then submit a money
7
order made payable to the witness for the full amount of the witness’s travel expenses plus the
8
daily witness fee of $40.00. The subpoena will not be served upon the unincarcerated witness by
9
the United States Marshal unless the money order is tendered to the Court.
10
III.
Conclusion and Order
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for the attendance of
11
12
unincarcerated and incarcerated witnesses (ECF No. 157) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED
13
IN PART:
1. Plaintiff’s motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses Donald Ray Perry
14
15
(CDCR #P92110, Correctional Training Facility (“Soledad State Prison”)); George
16
Hamilton (CDCR #K54885, Pelican Bay State Prison); Allen B. Williams (CDCR
17
#C09851, Ironwood State Prison); and Jimmy Serna (CDCR #AK2741, Kern Valley
18
State Prison), is DENIED;
19
2. Plaintiff’s motion for the attendance of voluntary unincarcerated witnesses Denice
20
Porter, Ellis Porter, Lisa Turner, Francisco Diaz (Catholic Chaplain at Kern Valley
21
State Prison), and Maurice Howard (Muslim Chaplain at Kern Valley State Prison) is
22
GRANTED, subject to Plaintiff’s offer of proof for each witness;
3. Plaintiff’s motion for the attendance of involuntary unincarcerated witness Paul
23
24
Shleffar (Jewish Chaplain of CDCR) is GRANTED, subject to:
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
3
a. Plaintiff’s submission of the location of Rabbi Shleffar, due on or before July
1
2
17, 2017; and
b. Plaintiff’s submission of the money order with applicable witness fees, due on
3
4
or before August 4, 2017.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
July 11, 2017
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?