Porter v. Wegman et al
Filing
18
ORDER Denying 17 Request for Entry of Default, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/20/11. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
BRIAN ELLIS PORTER,
7
8
CASE NO. 1:10-CV-01500-DLB PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR ENTRY
OF DEFAULT
v.
(DOC. 17)
9
JAMES YATES, et al.,
10
Defendants.
/
11
12
Plaintiff Brian Ellis Porter (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se
13
and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is
14
proceeding on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed June 3, 2011, against Defendant
15
Cherylee Wegman. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for entry of default, filed
16
December 5, 2011. Doc. 17.
17
Plaintiff contends that Defendant Cherylee Wegman has failed to answer or otherwise
18
respond to Plaintiff’s complaint, and requests an entry of default accordingly. Plaintiff is correct
19
that Defendant Cherylee Wegman has not responded. However, Plaintiff is incorrect when he
20
asserts that Defendant Wegman has been served. As indicated on the order directing the United
21
States Marshal to effect service, after the waiver of service is mailed, Defendant is granted sixty
22
days in which to respond. Doc. 16. Additionally, the Marshal has not indicated that service was
23
completed. Thus, entry of default against Defendant Wegman at this time is premature.
24
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for entry of default, filed
25
December 5, 2011, is DENIED.
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
3b142a
December 20, 2011
/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?