Porter v. Wegman et al

Filing 18

ORDER Denying 17 Request for Entry of Default, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/20/11. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 BRIAN ELLIS PORTER, 7 8 CASE NO. 1:10-CV-01500-DLB PC Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT v. (DOC. 17) 9 JAMES YATES, et al., 10 Defendants. / 11 12 Plaintiff Brian Ellis Porter (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se 13 and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is 14 proceeding on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed June 3, 2011, against Defendant 15 Cherylee Wegman. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for entry of default, filed 16 December 5, 2011. Doc. 17. 17 Plaintiff contends that Defendant Cherylee Wegman has failed to answer or otherwise 18 respond to Plaintiff’s complaint, and requests an entry of default accordingly. Plaintiff is correct 19 that Defendant Cherylee Wegman has not responded. However, Plaintiff is incorrect when he 20 asserts that Defendant Wegman has been served. As indicated on the order directing the United 21 States Marshal to effect service, after the waiver of service is mailed, Defendant is granted sixty 22 days in which to respond. Doc. 16. Additionally, the Marshal has not indicated that service was 23 completed. Thus, entry of default against Defendant Wegman at this time is premature. 24 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for entry of default, filed 25 December 5, 2011, is DENIED. 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a December 20, 2011 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?