Haney v. Epstein et al
ORDER Denying Motion To Compel Initial Discovery Responses As Moot (Doc. 31 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/11/2012. (Fahrney, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRUCE PATRICK HANEY,
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01506-LJO-SKO PC
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL
INITIAL DISCOVERY RESPONSES AS
L. EPTSTEIN, et al.,
Plaintiff Bruce Patrick Haney is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action
for violation of his rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action for damages is proceeding on
Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendants Epstein and Gonzales.
On May 16, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking to compel Defendants to respond to his
interrogatories, request for admissions, and request for production of documents, which he served
on March 21, 2012. On May 22, 2012, Defendants filed an opposition to the motion, arguing that
it should be denied as moot because they served their discovery responses on May 16, 2012.
Plaintiff did not file a reply.
In as much as Plaintiff’s motion sought to compel initial responses which were served on
May 16, 2012, Plaintiff’s motion is HEREBY ORDERED DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 11, 2012
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?