Jones v. Mayberg et al
Filing
42
ORDER Directing Personal Service of Subpoena Duces Tecum by United States Marshals Service Without Prepayment of Costs re 32 , 42 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 06/10/14. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
OSCAR W. JONES,
Case No. 1:10-cv-01530-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
STEPHEN MAYBERG, et al.,
14
ORDER DIRECTING PERSONAL SERVICE
OF SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM BY
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
(Docs. 32 and 40)
15
16
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 45, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as
17 follows:
18
1.
The Clerk of the Court shall forward the following documents to the United States
19 Marshal (USM):
a.
One (1) completed and issued subpoena duces tecum to be served on:
Scott Frauenheim, Warden,
Pleasant Valley State Prison,
24863 West Jayne Ave.
P.O. Box. 8500
Coalinga, CA, 93210;
b.
One (1) completed USM-285 form; and
c.
20
Two (2) copies of this order, one to accompany the subpoena and one for
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
the USM;
2.
Within twenty (20) days from the date of this order, the USM is DIRECTED to
serve the subpoena in accordance with the provisions of Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil
1 Procedure;
2
3.
The USM SHALL effect personal service of the subpoena duces tecum, along with
3 a copy of this order, upon the individual/entity named in the subpoena pursuant to Rule 45 of the
4 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c); and
5
4.
Within ten (10) days after personal service is effected, the USM SHALL file the
6 return of service, along with the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service, and said costs
7 shall be enumerated on the USM-285 form.
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 10, 2014
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?