Yang et al v. Sun Trust Mortgage, Inc.

Filing 30

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/11/2011 dismissing causes of action and defendant Michael J. Carter and extending time to file a responsive pleading. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CHANG BEE YANG, an individual; and LAU YANG, an individual, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) SUN TRUST MORTGAGE, INC., a ) Virginia Corporation, and Does 1 ) through 25, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) 11 12 13 14 15 16 NO. 1:10-CV-01541 AWI SKO ORDER DISMISSING CAUSES OF ACTION AND DEFENDANT MICHAEL J. CARTER, AND EXTENDING TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING 17 18 Pursuant to the parties’ April 21, 2010 stipulation: 19 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs CHANG BEE YANG and LAU YANG have agreed to dismiss 20 Defendant MICHAEL J. CARTER from this action; 21 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs CHANG BEE YANG and LAU YANG have agreed to grant an 22 extension of time by which Defendant SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., has to respond to the 23 above-entitled action; 24 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Cause of action number 24 for Unfair Business Practices in Violation of California 26 Business and Professions Code Section 17200; cause of action number 25 for Civil 27 Conspiracy; cause of action number 26 for Conversion; cause of action number 27 for 28 Declaratory Relief; cause of action number 28 for Accounting; cause of action number 29 1 for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; and cause of action number 30 for Breach 2 of Written Contract are DISMISSED. 3 2. Defendant MICHAEL J. CARTER is DISMISSED from this action. 4 3. Defendant SUN TRUST MORTGAGE, INC., shall have up to and including May 9, 2011 5 to file a responsive pleading. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: 0m8i78 May 11, 2011 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?