Yang et al v. Sun Trust Mortgage, Inc.
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/11/2011 dismissing causes of action and defendant Michael J. Carter and extending time to file a responsive pleading. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
CHANG BEE YANG, an individual;
and LAU YANG, an individual,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
SUN TRUST MORTGAGE, INC., a
)
Virginia Corporation, and Does 1
)
through 25, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
11
12
13
14
15
16
NO. 1:10-CV-01541 AWI SKO
ORDER DISMISSING CAUSES OF
ACTION AND DEFENDANT
MICHAEL J. CARTER, AND
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE A
RESPONSIVE PLEADING
17
18
Pursuant to the parties’ April 21, 2010 stipulation:
19
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs CHANG BEE YANG and LAU YANG have agreed to dismiss
20
Defendant MICHAEL J. CARTER from this action;
21
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs CHANG BEE YANG and LAU YANG have agreed to grant an
22
extension of time by which Defendant SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., has to respond to the
23
above-entitled action;
24
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
Cause of action number 24 for Unfair Business Practices in Violation of California
26
Business and Professions Code Section 17200; cause of action number 25 for Civil
27
Conspiracy; cause of action number 26 for Conversion; cause of action number 27 for
28
Declaratory Relief; cause of action number 28 for Accounting; cause of action number 29
1
for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; and cause of action number 30 for Breach
2
of Written Contract are DISMISSED.
3
2.
Defendant MICHAEL J. CARTER is DISMISSED from this action.
4
3.
Defendant SUN TRUST MORTGAGE, INC., shall have up to and including May 9, 2011
5
to file a responsive pleading.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated:
0m8i78
May 11, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?