Robert Medrano et al v. Richard Hamlin, et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER continuing the hearing date of Plaintiffs' motion to remand action to the Superior Court. The hearing currently set for 11/17/2010 is CONTINUED to 12/15/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Shei la K. Oberto. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), Defendant's Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition shall be due not later than Wednesday, December 1, 2010. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(d), Plaintiffs' Reply to any Opposition provided by Defendant shall be due not later than Wednesday, December 8, 2010. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/15/2010. (Timken, A)

Robert Medrano et al v. Richard Hamlin, et al

Doc. 14

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Michael J. Burns (SBN 172614) E-mail: [e-mail] 560 Mission Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant GENCO I, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO ROBERT MEDRANO and ALBERT LANDA, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) GENCO SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS aka ) GENCO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM and ) GENCO, INC.; RICHARD HAMLIN, and ) DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 10-CV-01555-LJO-SKO STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND ACTION TO THE SUPERIOR COURT; AND ORDER

Complaint Filed: July 9, 2010

STIPULATION The Parties to the above entitled action, GENCO I, INC. ("Defendant") and ROBERT MEDRANO AND ALBERT LANDA (collectively "Plaintiffs") (collectively referred to as the "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Defendant filed its Notice of Removal [Diversity Jurisdiction] ("Notice") in this

Court on August 27, 2010, removing this matter from the Superior Court, State of California, County of Fresno. 2. Plaintiffs thereafter filed their Motion to Remand Action to the Superior Court,

State of California, County of Fresno and for Just Costs and Actual Expenses, Including Attorney's Fees ("Motion") on September 24, 2010. Stipulation to Continue Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Action to the Superior Court; and Order; Case No. 10-CV-01555-LJO-SKO
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

3. 9:30 a.m. 4.

Plaintiffs' Motion is currently scheduled for hearing on November 17, 2010 at

Counsel for Defendant, Michael J. Burns, the only attorney to have filed an

appearance on behalf of Defendant, has a prior obligation in another matter on November 17, 2010 and is unable to attend the hearing as scheduled. 5. Counsel for Defendant and counsel for both Plaintiffs have agreed to reschedule

the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for December 15, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. and hereby request that the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion be rescheduled on that date. 6. Given the rescheduled date for the hearing, Defendant's Opposition or Statement

of Non-Opposition is due by Wednesday, December 1, 2010. Plaintiffs' Reply to any Opposition is due by Wednesday, December 8, 2010. DATED: November 4, 2010 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By

/s/ Michael J. Burns Michael J. Burns

Attorneys for Defendant GENCO DATED: November 10, 2010 TOMASSIAN, PIMENTEL & SHAPAZIAN

By

/s/ Larry H. Shapazian Larry H. Shapazian

Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERTO MEDRANO DATED: November 3, 2010 LAW OFFICE OF DEAN B. GORGON

By

/s/ Dean B. Gordon Dean B. Gordon

Attorneys for Plaintiff ALBERTO LANDA

2

Stipulation to Continue Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Action to the Superior Court; and Order; Case No. 10-CV-01555-LJO-SKO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:
DEAC_Signature-END:

ORDER THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion, currently scheduled for Wednesday, November

17, 2010, at 9:30 a.m. is continued to Wednesday, December 15, 2010, at 9:30 a.m. 2. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), Defendant's Opposition or Statement of Non-

Opposition shall be due not later than Wednesday, December 1, 2010. 3. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(d), Plaintiffs' Reply to any Opposition provided by

Defendant shall be due not later than Wednesday, December 8, 2010.

November 15, 2010

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ie14hje

3

Stipulation to Continue Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Action to the Superior Court; and Order; Case No. 10-CV-01555-LJO-SKO