Moore v. Leingang Enterprises et al
Filing
10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/10/2010. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
Moore v. Leingang Enterprises et al
Doc. 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 /s/Tanya Moore Tanya Moore Attorney for Plaintiff Date: December 10, 2010 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. No defendant having appeared in this action, Plaintiff requests that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, vs. LEINGANG ENTERPRISES, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) No. 1:10-CV-01575-AWI-SKO ) ) REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ) ) ACTION; ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore Tanya Moore, Esq. SBN 206683 MO O RE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 N. Second Street San Jose, CA 95112 Telephone (408) 271-6600 Facsimile (408) 298-6046
M o o r e v. Leingang Enteprises, et al. S tip u la tio n for Dismissal
Page 1
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 December 10, 2010 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE No defendant having appeared in this action and upon the request of Plaintiff, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. ORDER
Moore v. Leingang Enteprises, et al. S tip u la tio n for Dismissal
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?