Rubio v. Walgreen Co., et al.

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/5/2011. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff Fernando Rubio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff Fernando Rubio vs. WALGREEN CO., et al., Defendants. FERNANDO RUBIO, Plaintiff, ) No. 1:10-cv-01576 SKO ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ) ACTION; ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Fernando Rubio and Defendants Walgreen Co., dba Walgreens, and Selma Property, LLC (erroneously sued herein as Walgreenselma LLC), the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Dated: April 5, 2011 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

Rubio v. Walgreen Co., et al. Stipulation for Dismissal; Order

Page 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Dated: April 1, 2011

JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL, LLP

/s/ Martin H. Orlick Martin H. Orlick, Attorneys for Defendant Selma Property, LLC Dated: April 1, 2011 BERRY & BLOCK LLP

/s/ Brian Crone Brian Crone, Attorneys for Defendant Walgreen Co. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DEAC_Signature-END:

Dated:

April 5, 2011

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ie14hje

Rubio v. Walgreen Co., et al. Stipulation for Dismissal; Order

Page 2