Perkins v. Yanez et al

Filing 12

ORDER DENYING 11 Motion to Amend as UNNECESSARY signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/16/2011. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

ANTHONY LOREN PERKINS,

10

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01610-SKO PC

Plaintiff,

11

v.

12

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND
AS UNNECESSARY

P. YANEZ, et al.,

(Doc. 11)
13

Defendants.
/

14
15

Plaintiff Anthony Loren Perkins, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,

16

filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 7, 2010. On May 11, 2011,

17

Plaintiff filed a second motion seeking leave to amend. As Plaintiff was previously informed in the

18

order filed on April 26, 2011, he does not need leave of court to amend because he may amend once

19

as a matter of right at this stage in the proceedings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1).

20
21

Plaintiff’s motion seeking leave to amend is unnecessary and it is HEREBY ORDERED
DENIED on that ground.

22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated:
ie14hj

May 16, 2011

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1