Quinn v. Fresno County Sheriff et al

Filing 213

STIPULATION TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE COURT'S PREVIOUS ORDER GRANTING CERTAIN OF THE PARTIES PREVIOUSLY FILED MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on September 11, 2013. (Munoz, I)

1

James J. Arendt, Esq.
Roy C. Santos, Esq.

Bar No. 142937
Bar No. 259718

2
3
4

WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP
1630 East Shaw Avenue, Suite 176
Fresno, California 93710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF FRESNO and DAVID ALANIS
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

JAMES LORAN QUINN,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF, FRESNO
)
COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, )
OFFICER DAVID ALANIS, OFFICER
)
LEONARD RICHERT, FRESNO COUNTY )
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FRESNO
)
COUNTY JAIL, ET AL. and DOES 1 to 100 )
INCLUSIVE,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________ )

CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-01617-LJO-BAM

STIPULATION TO THE ENFORCEMENT
OF THE COURT’S PREVIOUS ORDER
GRANTING CERTAIN OF THE PARTIES
PREVIOUSLY FILED MOTIONS IN LIMINE
AND ORDER

19
20

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, and

21

ordered by this Court, that the Court’s Orders, Document Nos. 120 & 123, granting certain of the parties

22

motions in limine be applicable to the present trial and thus preventing the needless refiling of these

23

select motions in limine. The parties stipulate to the following previously filed motions in limine which

24

were granted by the Court:

25

(1)

Plaintiff’s previously filed motion in limine number 1 (Doc. No. 110);

26

(2)

Defendants’ previously filed motions in limine numbers 2-3, 5-8, 14 and 16-17 (Doc. No.

27
28

111);
The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Orders granting each of these previously filed
____________________________
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

1

motions in limine have the same control as they did in the previous trial; unless, the Court so chooses

2

to alter it’s Orders. (Doc. Nos. 110, 111, 120 & 123)

3
4

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: September 10, 2013

WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP

5
6

By:

/s/ Roy C. Santos
James J. Arendt
Roy C. Santos
Attorneys for Defendants

By:

/s/ David M. Hollingsworth
David M. Hollingsworth
Attorney for Plaintiff

7
8
9
10

DATED: September 10, 2013

11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14

Dated:

September 11, 2013

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
66h44d
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
____________________________
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

2