Quinn v. Fresno County Sheriff et al

Filing 230

AMENDED 229 Order After 228 Settlement, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/15/2013. Notice to Dismiss by 11/22/2013. (Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JAMES LORAN QUINN, CASE NO. CV F 10-1617 LJO BAM Plaintiff, 11 AMENDED ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT (Doc. 228.) vs. 12 13 14 15 16 FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., Defendants. Defense counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached among all parties. 17 18 Pursuant to this Court=s Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than 19 November 22, 2013, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, 20 or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed. 21 This Court VACATES all pending matters and dates, including the October 29, 2013 22 trial, which is subject to immediate resetting before any district judge of this Court if 23 24 settlement is not completed timely. 25 Failure to comply with this order will be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on 26 counsel or parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules160 and 272. 27 This Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they must obey the Federal Rules of 28 1 1 2 Civil Procedure and this Court=s Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court deems appropriate. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6 7 October 15, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?