Quinn v. Fresno County Sheriff et al

Filing 234

ORDER on Stipulated Dismissal, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/10/14: The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this action. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

1

James J. Arendt, Esq.
Roy C. Santos, Esq.

Bar No. 142937
Bar No. 259718

2
3
4
5

WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP
1630 East Shaw Avenue, Suite 176
Fresno, California 93710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7

Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF
FRESNO and DAVID ALANIS

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

JAMES LORAN QUINN,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF, FRESNO )
COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, )
OFFICER DAVID ALANIS, OFFICER
)
LEONARD RICHERT, FRESNO
)
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY,
)
FRESNO COUNTY JAIL, ET AL. and
)
DOES 1 to 100 INCLUSIVE,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-01617-LJO-BAM

STIPULATED DISMISSAL AND
ORDER

19
20

Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties to this action

21

stipulate to dismissal of the entire action, with prejudice, all parties to bear their own costs and

22

attorney’s fees.

23
24

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: January 10, 2014

WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP

25
By:

26
27

/s/ Roy C. Santos
James J. Arendt
Roy C. Santos
Attorneys for Defendants

28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

1

1

DATED: January 10, 2014

2
3

By:

/s/ David M. Hollingsworth
David M. Hollingsworth
Attorney for Plaintiff

Based on the parties’ stipulation for dismissal under F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this Court:

4
1.

DISMISSES with prejudice this entire action and all claims;

2.

VACATES all pending dates and matters; and

3.

DIRECTS the clerk to close this action.

5
6
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

January 10, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

2