Bradley v. Villa et al

Filing 32

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default 30 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/1/13. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 1:10-cv-01618-LJO-GSA-PC WILLIAM BRADLEY, 12 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT (Doc. 30.) Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 J. VILLA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 I. BACKGROUND William Bradley (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint 20 commencing this action on September 8, 2010. This case now proceeds on 21 Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint filed on September 14, 2012, against defendant Villa for 22 use of excessive force, and defendants Hightower, Henderson, and Wood for failure to protect 23 Plaintiff, in violation of the Eighth Amendment.1 (Doc. 19.) 24 25 (Doc. 1.) On October 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default against defendants Villa, Hightower, Henderson, and Wood (“Defendants”). (Doc. 118.) 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff states in the Third Amended Complaint that he “wish[es] to proceed only against defendant L.Villa (Officer) for excessive force, and against defendants Hightower (Sgt.), Wood (Capt.) and Henderson (Lt.) for failure to protect Plaintiff.” 3rd Amd Cmp at 1:25-2:1. 1 1 II. ENTRY OF DEFAULT 2 Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for affirmative 3 relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal Rules of 4 Civil Procedure and where that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 55(a). Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, A[A] defendant must serve an 6 answer within 21 days after being served with the summons and complaint; or if it has timely 7 waived service under Rule 4(d), within 60 days after the request for a waiver was sent.@ Fed. 8 R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). Under Rule 4(d), a defendant may waive service of a summons by 9 signing and returning a waiver of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). If a defendant fails to plead or 10 otherwise defend an action after being properly served with a summons and complaint, default 11 may be entered pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 12 III. DISCUSSION 13 Plaintiff argues that Defendants failed to file a timely response to the Third Amended 14 Complaint, in violation of Rules 55 and 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff 15 acknowledges that on August 30, 2013, the court granted Defendants an extension of time until 16 October 11, 2013, in which to file a response. However, Plaintiff argues that Defendants failed 17 to file a response by October 11, 2013. The record in this action shows otherwise. On October 18 11, 2013, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. (Doc. 29.) Based on this record, 19 there is no evidence that Defendants failed to plead or otherwise defend against the Third 20 Amended Complaint, and Plaintiff is not entitled to entry of default against Defendants on this 21 ground. 22 Plaintiff is advised that the fact that Defendants have not filed an Answer in this action 23 does not entitle Plaintiff to entry of default. Under Rule 55, default may be entered if a 24 defendant Afails to plead or otherwise defend.@ Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 (emphasis added). The filing 25 of a motion to dismiss is evidence that Defendants have defended in this action, precluding 26 entry of default under Rule 55. Therefore, Plaintiff’s request shall be denied. 27 /// 28 /// 2 1 IV. Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for entry of 2 3 CONCLUSION default against Defendants, filed on October 25, 2013, is DENIED. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 8 9 10 November 1, 2013 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 6i0kij8d 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?