Arres, et al. vs. The City of Fresno, et al.

Filing 37

ORDER Directing Additional Briefing in Support of Attorneys' Motions for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff Benicia Fuentes [Docs. 33 and 34]: - submit supplemental briefs on or before 10/7/2011. signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/22/2011. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10

BENICIA FUENTES as Guardian ad Litem
of minors, L.G. and J.G. as successors
in interest to Decedent,

11
12
13
14

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01628-LJO-SMS
ORDER DIRECTING ADDITIONAL
BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF ATTORNEYS’
MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF BENICIA
FUENTES

Plaintiff,
v.
THE CITY OF FRESNO, et al.,
Defendants.

(Docs. 33 and 34)
/

15
16

On August 22, 2011, attorneys Yan Shrayberman and Mario DiSalvo, counsel for

17

Plaintiff Benicia Fuentes, Guardian ad Litem of minors, L.G. and J.G., filed individual actions to

18

withdraw as counsel as a result of their inability to locate their client. Defendants have filed a

19

statement of non-opposition.

20

Local Rule 83-182(d) provides, in pertinent part, “Withdrawal as attorney is governed by

21

the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California, and the attorney shall conform

22

to the requirements of those Rules.” Generally, inability to locate the client is grounds for

23

withdrawal from representation under C.R.C.P. 3-700(B). Cal. State Bar Formal Ops. 1989-111,

24

2002-160; Los Angeles Bar Ass’n Formal Op. 441 (1987). In this case, however, Benicia

25

Fuentes is not bringing the law suit individually, but is acting as guardian ad litem for minors

26

L.G. and J.G. A guardian ad litem cannot represent the minors without counsel. Mossanen v.

27

Monfared, 77 Cal. App.4th 1402, 1409 (2000).

28

When a guardian ad litem retains counsel for a minor, the attorney-client relationship
1

1

exists with the minor, not the guardian. Paul W. Vapnek, et al., California Practice Guide

2

Professional Responsibility § 3:122 (Rutter Group 2009). See Berry v. Chaplin, 74 Cal.App.2d

3

652, 657 (1946). A court errs if it permits counsel to withdraw before new counsel for a minor is

4

retained. Mossanen, 77 Cal App.4th at 1410; Torres v. Friedman, 169 Cal.App.3d 880, 888

5

(1985).
Neither Mossanen nor Torres considered a fact situation in which an attorney sought to

6
7

withdraw from a case because he or she could not locate the guardian ad litem. Accordingly,

8

Plaintiffs’ counsel are hereby directed to submit supplemental briefs on or before October 7,

9

2011, addressing with specificity the appropriate procedure to be followed to ensure protection of

10

the rights of the minor Plaintiffs, L.G. and J.G. The matter shall then be deemed submitted for

11

decision pursuant to Local Rule 230(h) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 78).

12
13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16

Dated:
icido3

September 22, 2011

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2