Jamison v. Capello et al
Filing
35
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/22/2015. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
WILLIE JAMISON ,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01633-MJS (PC)
ORDER
DISMISSING
ACTION
PURUSANT TO FED. R. CIV. P 25(a)(1)
v.
(ECF No. 34)
M. CAPELLO, et al.,
Defendants.
CLERK TO TERMINATE PENDING
MOTIONS AND CLOSE CASE
15
16
Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
17
brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds against Defendants Capello
18
and Kuntz on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims. All parties have consented to
19
Magistrate Judge jurisdiction for all purposes.
20
On November 20, 2014, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF
21
No. 30.) Plaintiff did not respond and, on January 7, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff to
22
file a response or face dismissal for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 32.) Plaintiff filed no
23
opposition and, on February 18, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the
24
action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 33.) The Court’s orders were returned as
25
undeliverable. Thereafter, on March 20, 2015, Defendants notified the Court of Plaintiff’s
26
death on or about January 29, 2015. (ECF No. 34.)
27
More than ninety days have passed since Defendants served their notice of
28
1
1
Plaintiff’s death. No successor or representative has moved to substitute for Plaintiff as
2
to any claims that were not extinguished. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims must be
3
dismissed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1).
4
Based on the foregoing, this action is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
5
Procedure 25(a)(1). The Clerk’s Office is directed to terminate any pending motions and
6
close the case.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 22, 2015
/s/
10
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?