Colon v. Zia, et al.

Filing 16

ORDER For Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why Defendant Zia Should Not Be Dismissed For Failure to Effect Service re 15 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/17/2011. Thirty Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

FRANCISCO COLON,

10

1:10-cv-01642-GSA-PC

Plaintiff,

11

v.

12

ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY DEFENDANT ZIA SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO EFFECT
SERVICE
(Doc. 15.)

DR. ZIA, et al.,

13

Defendants.

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE
/

14
15

I.

BACKGROUND

16

Francisco Colon (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action

17

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on September

18

10, 2010. (Doc. 1.) On October 6, 2010, Plaintiff consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this

19

action, and no other parties have made an appearance. (Doc. 5.) Therefore, pursuant to Appendix

20

A(k)(4) of the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, the undersigned shall conduct any

21

and all proceedings in the case until such time as reassignment to a District Judge is required. Local

22

Rule Appendix A(k)(3).

23

This action now proceeds on Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed on January 13, 2011,

24

against defendant Dr. K. Zia (“Defendant”), for inadequate dental care in violation of the Eighth

25

Amendment.1 (Doc. 9.) On October 6, 2011, the United States Marshal (“Marshal”) filed a return

26
27
28

1

Plaintiff named only one defendant, Dr. Zia, in the First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 9.) Therefore, Dr.
Zia is the only defendant in this action. However, the case title assigned initially, Colon v. Zia, et al., remains the
same.

1

1

of service unexecuted, indicating the Marshal was unable to locate Defendant for service of process.

2

(Doc. 15.)

3

II.

SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL

4

Pursuant to Rule 4(m),

5

If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court –
on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff – must dismiss the action without
prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.
But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time
for service for an appropriate period.

6
7
8

Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

9

In cases involving a plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis, the Marshal, upon order of the

10

Court, shall serve the summons and the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2). “‘[A]n incarcerated pro

11

se plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis is entitled to rely on the U.S. Marshal for service of the

12

summons and complaint and ... should not be penalized by having his action dismissed for failure

13

to effect service where the U.S. Marshal or the court clerk has failed to perform his duties.’” Walker

14

v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1422 (9th Cir. 1994) (quoting Puett v. Blandford, 912 F.2d 270, 275 (9th

15

Cir. 1990)), abrogated on other grounds by Sandin v. Connor, 515 U.S. 472 (1995). “So long as the

16

prisoner has furnished the information necessary to identify the defendant, the marshal’s failure to

17

effect service is ‘automatically good cause . . . .’” Walker, 14 F.3d at 1422 (quoting Sellers v. United

18

States, 902 F.2d 598, 603 (7th Cir.1990)). However, where a pro se plaintiff fails to provide the

19

Marshal with accurate and sufficient information to effect service of the summons and complaint,

20

the Court’s sua sponte dismissal of the unserved defendants is appropriate. Walker, 14 F.3d at 1421-

21

22.

22

Background

23

On April 18, 2011, the Court issued an order directing the Marshal to initiate service of

24

process upon Defendant in this action. (Doc. 12.) On May 19, 2011, the Marshal filed a return of

25

service unexecuted as to Defendant. (Doc. 13.) The return of service indicated that on April 21,

26

2011, the Marshal mailed a summons and complaint to Defendant at Avenal State Prison (“ASP”),

27

at the address provided by Plaintiff. Id. On May 16, 2011, the Litigation Coordinator at ASP

28

///
2

1

reported to the Marshal that Defendant is retired from employment at ASP and is not listed in the

2

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (“CDCR”) database. Id.

3

On September 16, 2011, the Court issued an order directing the Marshal to again attempt to

4

locate and serve Defendant, using the assistance of the CDCR’s Legal Affairs Division. (Doc. 14.)

5

The Marshal’s second attempt to locate and serve Defendant was unsuccessful, and on October 6,

6

2011, the Marshal filed a return of service unexecuted indicating that the Marshal mailed the

7

summons and complaint to Defendant on September 23, 2011, and the mail was returned by the U.S.

8

Postal Service with a notation “Attempted, not known.” (Doc. 15.)

9

Pursuant to Rule 4(m), the Court will provide Plaintiff with the opportunity to show cause

10

why Defendant Zia should not be dismissed from the action at this time for inability to serve process.

11

Plaintiff has not provided sufficient information to identify and locate Defendant for service of

12

process, and the Marshal was unable to locate Defendant using the assistance of the CDCR’s Legal

13

Affairs Division. If Plaintiff is unable to provide the Marshal with additional information, Defendant

14

Zia shall be dismissed from the action, which will result in the dismissal of this action in its entirety.

15

III.

CONCLUSION

16

Accordingly, based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

17

1.

Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show

18

cause why Defendant Zia should not be dismissed from this action pursuant to Rule

19

4(m); and

20

2.

The failure to respond to this order or the failure to show cause will result in the

21

dismissal of Defendant Zia from this action and the dismissal of this action in its

22

entirety.

23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
6i0kij

October 17, 2011

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
3