White v. Ruskovish et al

Filing 6

ORDER granting 5 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/17/2010. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
White v. Ruskovish et al Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. 3. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff filed his initial complaint on September 8, 2010. On November 2, 2010, the complaint was dismissed, and Plaintiff was given thirty (30) days to amend his complaint. (Doc. 4.) On November 15, 2010, Plaintiff requested a 30-day extension of time to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 5.) This request will be granted. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's request for a 30-day extension of time to file an amended complaint is GRANTED; Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days from the date of this order; Plaintiff may not incorporate any new, unrelated claims to this action via his v. JOHNATHON BITTIS RSKOVISH; LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY Defendants. / ADRIAN JOE WHITE, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01647-LJO-SKO ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. amended complaint; and If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint, the Court will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim and for failure to prosecute the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ie14hj November 17, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?