Theresa Wallen v. Mahrek et al
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER of DISMISSAL with Prejudice signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/29/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Theresa Wallen
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
THERESA WALLEN,
) No. 1:10-CV-01677-AWI-SKO
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
vs.
)
ALI SALEH MAHREK dba THE TOBACCO )
STORE PLUS; TOMITY CORPORATION, )
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Theresa Wallen, through her
19
counsel, and Defendant Tomity Corporation, through its counsel, and Defendant Ali Saleh
20
Mahrek, who is self-represented, the parties to this action, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
21
Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its
22
entirety.
23
24
Date: June 3, 2011
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
25
26
/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Theresa Wallen
27
28
///
Wallen v. Mahrek, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order
Page 1
1
Date: June 29, 2011
DOWLING, AARON & KEELER
2
3
/s/ Keith M. White
Keith M. White, Attorneys for
Defendant Tomity Corporation
4
5
6
Date: June 6, 2011
/s/ Ali Saleh Mahrek
Ali Saleh Mahrek dba The Tobacco
Store Plus, Defendant in Propria Persona
7
8
9
ORDER
10
11
The parties having so stipulated,
12
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
Dated:
June 29, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
18
19
0m8i788
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Wallen v. Mahrek, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?