Gutierrez v. Walgreens Co., et al.

Filing 34

Stipulation For Dismissal of Action and ORDER, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/8/2011. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]

4
5

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Natividad Gutierrez

6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

NATIVIDAD GUTIERREZ,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.
WALGREENS CO. dba WALGREENS and
BDC CLOVIS L.P.,

15
Defendants.

16
17

) No. 1:10-CV-01703-LJO-SMS
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
)
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Natividad Gutierrez and

19

Defendants Walgreen Co. and BDC Clovis, L.P., the parties to this action, by and through their

20

respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-

21

captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
Date: July 8, 2011
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

22
23
24

/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff Natividad Gutierrez

25
26
27
28

//
//

Gutierrez v. Walgreens Co., et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order

Page 1

1

Date: July 8, 2011

BERRY & BLOCK LLP

2
3

/s/ Erick C. Turner
Erick C. Turner, Attorneys for
Defendant Walgreen Co.

4
5
6

Date: July 8, 2011

BRAGG & KULUVA

7
/s/ Kenneth L. Dziesinski
Kenneth L. Dziesinski, Attorneys for
Defendant BDC Clovis L.P.

8
9
10
11

ORDER

12
13

The parties having so stipulated,

14

This action is to be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18
19

Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

July 8, 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

b9ed48bb

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Gutierrez v. Walgreens Co., et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order

Page 2