McNeil v. Hayes et al
Filing
48
ORDER Striking Notice Regarding Intent To Seek Entry Of Default (Doc. 47 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/13/2013. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MICHAEL MCNEIL,
8
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01746-AWI-SKO PC
Plaintiff,
9
ORDER STRIKING NOTICE REGARDING
INTENT TO SEEK ENTRY OF DEFAULT
v.
(Doc. 47)
10
LVN HAYES, et al.,
11
Defendants.
/
12
13
Plaintiff Michael McNeil, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this
14
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 23, 2010. On February 11, 2013,
15
Plaintiff filed a notice warning Defendants Soto, Raman, and Byers of his intent to move for entry
16
of default within seven days.
17
Plaintiff incorrectly states that Defendants are in default. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). On February
18
4, 2013, the Court ordered Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff’s second amended complaint
19
within fifteen days. In accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants have until
20
February 22, 2013, within which to file their response. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d). Defendant Byers
21
timely filed an answer on February 12, 2013, and the deadline for Defendants Soto and Raman to
22
respond has not expired.
23
24
Accordingly, Defendants are not in default and Plaintiff’s notice of intent to file a motion
seeking entry of default is HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated:
i0d3h8
February 13, 2013
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?