Fields v. Rosenthal

Filing 77

ORDER Altering Time For Defendant To Respond To Plaintiff's Requested Rule 41 Dismissal (Doc. 75 ), signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/22/2014. (Responses due by 9/25/2014) (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 KEVIN E. FIELDS, 9 10 11 CASE NO. 1:10-CV-1764 AWI GSA Plaintiff v. RICHARD ROSENTHAL, 12 ORDER ALTERING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUESTED RULE 41 DISMISSAL Defendant 13 14 Currently pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 15 However, on September 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Rule 41(a) request to voluntarily dismiss this 16 case. See Doc. No. 75. On September 15, 2014, Defendant was ordered to file a response to 17 Plaintiff’s request. See Doc. No. 76. Plaintiff’s motion is one page, and Defendant has had notice 18 of Plaintiff’s request for 12 days. Upon further consideration, the Court will accelerate the time 19 for Defendant to file a response. 20 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff’s requested Rule 41(a) dismissal on or by Thursday, September 25, 2014. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 22, 2014 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?