Lopez v. Cate et al
Filing
223
ORDER Dismissing Action with Prejudice Per Stipulation 222 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/3/17. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ANDREW LOPEZ,
8
Plaintiff,
9
10
No. 1:10-cv-1773-DAD-SKO
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE PER STIPULATION
v.
(Doc. 222)
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
On September 29, 2017, the parties submitted a fully executed stipulation for voluntary
13
14
dismissal with prejudice of this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
15
(Doc. 222.) The parties agree that each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s
16
fees. (Id.)
In accordance with the parties’ stipulation, it is HEREBY ORDERED that this action is
17
18
dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court is ordered to close the case.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
Dated:
October 3, 2017
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?