Lopez v. Cate et al

Filing 223

ORDER Dismissing Action with Prejudice Per Stipulation 222 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/3/17. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANDREW LOPEZ, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 No. 1:10-cv-1773-DAD-SKO ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PER STIPULATION v. (Doc. 222) MATTHEW CATE, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 On September 29, 2017, the parties submitted a fully executed stipulation for voluntary 13 14 dismissal with prejudice of this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 15 (Doc. 222.) The parties agree that each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s 16 fees. (Id.) In accordance with the parties’ stipulation, it is HEREBY ORDERED that this action is 17 18 dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court is ordered to close the case. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: October 3, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?