Rangel v. Tilton et al

Filing 101

ORDER Granting Stipulation Continuing Trial and Pretrial Dates re 99 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/25/15. Jury Trial set for 9/15/2015 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe, Trial Confirmation Hearing set for 7/28/2015 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 LEONARDO JOSEPH RANGEL, 10 11 12 Plaintiff, v. D. LATRAILLE, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10-cv-01790-BAM (PC) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CONTINUING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES (ECF No. 98) Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing: July 28, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8 (BAM) Jury Trial: September 15, 2015, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8 (BAM) Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties filed on March 16, 2015, and the discussion at 18 the telephonic status conference held on March 25, 2015, the Amended Second Scheduling 19 Order is HEREBY MODIFIED as follows: 20 1. The telephonic trial confirmation hearing before the Honorable Barbara A. McAuliffe 21 22 is continued to July 28, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8; 2. The jury trial before the Honorable Barbara A. McAuliffe is continued to September 23 15, 2015, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8; 24 3. The parties shall initiate the telephonic trial confirmation hearing at (559) 499-5789): 25 4. 26 Plaintiff shall serve and file a pretrial statement and any motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses on or before June 15, 2015; and 27 28 1 1 5. Defendants shall serve and file a pretrial statement and any opposition to the motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses on or before June 24, 2015. 2 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara March 25, 2015 6 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?