Rangel v. Tilton et al

Filing 33

ORDER Requiring Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 31 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/6/12. Fifteen-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

LEONARDO JOSEPH RANGEL,

10
11
12

CASE NO. 1:10-cv–01790-BAM PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
COMPEL

v.
JAMES TILTON, et al.,

13

(ECF No. 31)

Defendants.

FIFTEEN DAY DEADLINE
/

14
15

Plaintiff Leonardo Joseph Rangel is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

16

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on the first

17

amended complaint, filed January 9, 2012, against Defendants Latraille and Tabor for excessive

18

force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On May 4, 2012, an order issued opening discovery

19

in this action, and on July 30, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel. Defendants have failed to

20

file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l).

21

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

22

1.

23
24

motion to compel within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order; and
2.

25
26
27

Defendants shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions deemed
appropriate by the Court. Local Rule 210.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411

September 6, 2012

/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28
1