Rangel v. Tilton et al

Filing 40

ORDER Requiring Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's 39 Motion for Sanctions, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/7/13. (21) Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 LEONARDO JOSEPH RANGEL, 10 11 12 CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01790-AWI-BAM PC Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS v. JAMES TILTON, et al., 13 (ECF No. 39) Defendants. TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE / 14 15 Plaintiff Leonardo Joseph Rangel is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 16 in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on the first 17 amended complaint, filed January 9, 2012, against Defendants Latraille and Tabor for excessive 18 force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 19 On December 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for discovery sanctions. Accordingly, it is 20 HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to 21 Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order. 22 Local Rule 230(l). Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions 23 deemed appropriate by the Court. Local Rule 110. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10c20k January 7, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?