Rangel v. Tilton et al
Filing
40
ORDER Requiring Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's 39 Motion for Sanctions, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/7/13. (21) Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
LEONARDO JOSEPH RANGEL,
10
11
12
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01790-AWI-BAM PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SANCTIONS
v.
JAMES TILTON, et al.,
13
(ECF No. 39)
Defendants.
TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE
/
14
15
Plaintiff Leonardo Joseph Rangel is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
16
in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on the first
17
amended complaint, filed January 9, 2012, against Defendants Latraille and Tabor for excessive
18
force in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
19
On December 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for discovery sanctions. Accordingly, it is
20
HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to
21
Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order.
22
Local Rule 230(l). Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions
23
deemed appropriate by the Court. Local Rule 110.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10c20k
January 7, 2013
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?