Rangel v. Tilton et al

Filing 71

ORDER Granting 69 Plaintiff's Request for an Extension of 45 Days to File An Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/11/13. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LEONARDO JOSEPH RANGEL,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
D. LATRAILLE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01790-AWI-BAM PC
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
FOR AN EXTENSION OF 45 DAYS TO FILE AN
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 69)
FORTY-FIVE DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Leonardo Joseph Rangel (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

On July 3, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file his opposition

20

to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff contends that the Court allowed Defendants

21

to file their motion for summary judgment, but did not address Plaintiff’s pending discovery motions.1

22

Plaintiff also explains that he requires additional time because he is preparing for a resentencing

23

hearing and will be transported to court.

24

Good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s request for a forty-five (45) day extension of time to file his

25

opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is HEREBY GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file

26
27
1

28

Prior to Plaintiff’s filing of the requested extension, the Court issued rulings on all but one pending discovery
motion. Plaintiff also has filed a motion to amend the complaint, which the Court will address in due course.

1

1

his opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment within forty-five (45) days from the date

2

of this order.

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

July 11, 2013

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2