Harrington v. Bautista et al

Filing 97

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to Parties' Stipulation re 96 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/25/2016. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GARRICK HARRINGTON,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
J. BAUTISTA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01802-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO PARTIES’
STIPULATION
[ECF No. 96]

Plaintiff Garrick Harrington is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On February 25, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal with prejudice
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the instant action is dismissed with prejudice and each
party is to bear its own costs, fees, or expenses, and there is no prevailing party in this action.

23
24
25
26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

February 25, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
1